Source: SCL
Usenet and IRC in Legal Services – The Missed Opportunities
In the early 2000s, both Usenet and IRC (Internet Relay Chat) were considered potential tools for lawyers to communicate and collaborate online. At a time when email was becoming the primary mode of communication, some predicted that these platforms could play a significant role in legal services. Usenet, a decentralised network of text-based discussion groups, was seen as a possible space for lawyers to share knowledge and discuss legal developments. Meanwhile, IRC offered real-time, instantaneous messaging, which had potential for team collaboration, client updates, and quick discussions. Despite the initial promise, neither platform made the impact that was expected in legal circles.
Why Usenet and IRC Missed the Mark for Lawyers
Both Usenet and IRC ultimately failed to gain traction in the legal sector for similar reasons. Usenet’s downfall was largely due to its lack of security and structure. The open, unregulated nature of the platform made it unsuitable for discussing sensitive legal topics, as law firms require platforms that ensure confidentiality and trustworthiness. Similarly, IRC fell short because it lacked the necessary security features to safeguard confidential client communications. While IRC provided real-time messaging, it was too simple to meet the legal industry’s demands for file sharing, document collaboration, and proper record-keeping.
The absence of built-in security and the inability to document or structure conversations left these platforms in the dust as law firms moved toward more secure, structured tools. Without robust features like file sharing or integration with other legal tech, both platforms became relics of an early internet that couldn’t keep pace with the evolving needs of the legal profession.
The Shift to Modern, Secure Platforms
As the legal industry modernised, platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams emerged as preferred communication tools. These platforms provide the real-time chat features that IRC once offered but with added security layers, file-sharing capabilities, and integrations with legal databases and document management systems. In contrast to Usenet’s chaotic, unmoderated discussions, these modern tools offer structured environments where lawyers can communicate securely while ensuring compliance with privacy regulations.
Both Usenet and IRC laid the groundwork for real-time collaboration and online discussion, but they ultimately couldn’t adapt to the specific needs of law firms. Today’s legal professionals require platforms that provide more than just messaging—security, confidentiality, and seamless integration with legal workflows are paramount. Usenet and IRC simply couldn’t keep up with the legal sector’s shift toward digital transformation, leaving them as footnotes in the history of legal tech.
Read More: SCL
